Summary of “Smart Buildings: What 'smart' really means” Draft #2

In the article “Smart Buildings: What 'smart' really means”, Lecomte (2019) states that having certification with standardized metrics is fundamental for smart buildings to wholly emerge in the "built environment". According to the article, the lack of unanimity from various stakeholders has delayed the drafting of standardized rubrics. Hence, private and public sectors design their own metrics to assess smart buildings but their rubrics vary from one another. However, the article also states that current private and public metrics are unsuccessful in tackling the complicated and expanding aspect that buildings will perform in "smart cities". Lecomte emphasizes that one crucial component needed to be included in the standardized rubrics will be cyber risk management as cyber threats "increase exponentially" along with more advanced and integrated technology in smart buildings. Lecomte concludes that holistic and reliable "smart building certifications and rubrics" will be the foundation of a "functioning market for smart real estate".

I agree with the author to a large extent regarding the focal point of the rubrics to assess smart building has to be the cyber risk management.



Lecomte, P. (2019, January 29). Smart Buildings: What 'smart' really means. Retrieved September 2019, from The Business Times: https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/opinion/smart-buildings-what-smart-really-means

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Letter

Annotated Summary

Task 3: The Importance of communication skills for engineers